Infringement Report

Home>Infringement Report> Infringement Report


Dear friends,

Welcome to the Infringement Report Webpage of National Palace Museum. You may report any suspicious infringing products or cases to the National Palace Museum (hereinafter referred to as the “Museum”) through this webpage.

To report any suspicious infringing products or cases, please refer to the “three steps to determine infringement” as explained below and leave your name, email address and related information. We will manage your report as soon as we receive it and contact you via email npmipprotection@dachenglaw.com.tw. We sincerely appreciate your collaboration with us to maintain the rights of cultural relics and related intellectual properties for the Museum.



Three steps to determine infringement

(1)Does the product label its origin from the Museum?

(2)The product claims to be authorized by the Museum but without the Museum’s trademark or laser label in full title.

(3) The product is relatively poor in quality or more vivid in color and so on.


※Examples on how to determine infringement:

1. There are such words as “Taipei National Palace,”“Palace Collection,”“Only One Original,”“Limited Copies” but without the mark “National Palace Museum” or the trademark of the Museum in full title.

 ◎ The museum emblem and full-title trademark guide

Description Image
Museum Emblem


Museum trademark in full title

2. The products are labeled “professional imitation of painting and calligraphy,” or claimed to be “ancient traditional Chinese painting” but have deeper and brighter background color, or have many seals or look like ancient painting. Other cultural creative products like tapes or rubber tapes are roughly made or have bad printing quality.

 ◎ Examples on how to identify infringing products

  Image of Infringing Product Original Work References for Infringement Identification
1 Not authorized by the Museume, this infrining product is a painting copied directly from the image file of the Museum with its background being made brighter. It has infringed the reproduction right of the Museum.
2 Not authorized by the Museume,this infrining product is claimed to be a“professional imitation of painting.”In comparison with the image file of the Museum, the infrining merchant has only deepened its color. It has infringed the reproduction right of the Museum.
3 With its print and background identical to the product of the Museum, this infringing product has only deepened its colors. As it is used for the same product (paper tape), it is a case of “dead copy” that infringes the reproduction and modification rights of the Museum.

Fill the reporting information

  • print
  • Forward
  • back
  • share to Facebook share to Plurk share to Twitter